The Supreme Court on Thursday stated it is going to cross orders on Friday on pleas to provoke contempt proceedings in opposition to humorist Kunal Kamra and cartoonist Rachita Taneja for scandalising the court docket and the best judiciary with their tweets.
“Heard [the petitions]. We will pass orders tomorrow,” a three-judge Bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan stated on the finish of the separate hearings in each instances of contempt of court docket on Thursday.
December 18 is the final working day for the court docket earlier than closing for winter holidays.
In the case in opposition to Mr. Kamra, legislation pupil Shrirang Katneshwarkar’s counsel Nishant Katneshwarkar submitted that the tweets by the comedian had been scandalous.
Mr. Katneshwarkar went on to give a date-wise chronology of the varied tweets of the comic. The lawyer, whereas doing so, abruptly stopped at one level, saying “I don’t want to even read this tweet”.
He submitted that Attorney General Okay.Okay. Venugopal had already given his statutory consent.
Mr. Venugopal had consented to contempt action in opposition to Mr. Kamra, saying the tweets had been grossly vulgar and obnoxious. They had an inclination to decrease the authority of the Supreme Court and undermined public confidence within the court docket.
Mr. Kamra had refused to apologise or retract the tweets. Instead, he had tweeted that he wished to “volunteer” the time that could be allotted for listening to his contempt case to others “who have not been as lucky and privileged as I am to jump the queue”.
“May I suggest the demonetisation petition, the petition challenging the revocation of J&K’s special status, the matter of the legality of electoral bonds or countless other matters that are more deserving of time and attention,” Mr. Kamra had written in a press release, once more on Twitter.
Appearing for the petitioner in opposition to Ms. Tameka, senior advocate P.S. Narasimha stated there was a transparent opinion from the Attorney General that her cartoons supposed to scandalise and undermine the judiciary.
Mr. Narasimha submitted that the tweets intentionally supposed to shake the arrogance of the general public within the judiciary.
The tweets concern the court docket’s grant of bail to Republic TV editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami. Mr. Venugopal had, in his consent letter, stated the tweets containing the cartoon carried the gross insinuation that the court docket had ceased to be an neutral organ of the state.