Saturday, January 23, 2021
No menu items!

Supreme Court compares politics, corporate governance

Must Read

Michael Stuhlbarg Joins Hulu Limited Series Dopesick’

Los Angeles, Dec 15: “Your Honor” actor Michael Stuhlbarg has boarded the forged of Michael Keaton-led Hulu restricted...

Bengal Speaker Rejects Suvendu Adhikari’s Resignation, Says It Flouts Rules of House

File photograph of former TMC chief Suvendu Adhikari"Unless and until I am satisfied that the resignation is voluntary...

COVID-19 | Russia signs more deals with India to make 300mn Sputnik V vaccines

“In India, we have agreements with four large manufacturers,” Dmitriev, the pinnacle of the Russian Direct Investment Fund...


The Supreme Court on Tuesday drew a parallel between politics and corporate governance when minority shareholder Shapoorji Pallonji complained of undue interference from Tata trustees within the operating of Tata Sons, giving the board hardly any independence.

A Bench led by Chief Justice of India Sharad A. Bobde stated the scenario was akin to a Chief Minister opting to seek the advice of his celebration colleagues earlier than a Cabinet assembly. Senior advocate C.A. Sundaram, for Shapoorji Pallonji Group, alleged interference by the stakeholder trustee-directors within the operating of Tata Sons.

“Let us take the case of a Chief Minister who before the Cabinet meeting consults some party colleagues on what to do and what not to do. Will you say he has lost his independence?” Justice Bobde requested.

Mr. Sundaram stated politics was completely different from corporate governance.

“In the commercial world, money is equivalent to power. Money is a kind of power. If in order to preserve money in a company, somebody seeks assistance from someone outside respected by him or a former chairman, does it amount to loss of independence of board,” the Bench requested once more.

“Yes, it does. In fact, in politics, majoritarianism accounts for everything. This is not the case under the Companies Act,” Mr. Sundaram responded.

On the difficulty of interference and pre-consultation with the trustee administrators in operating the affairs of Tata Sons, the senior lawyer stated, the “role of shareholders cannot be to run the affairs of the company. They can only work for the welfare of the company.”

On the explanation behind the feud between Cyrus Mistry and Tata Sons, Mr. Sundaram contended that issues had come to a head as a result of Mr. Mistry had been set to desk a corporate governance doc, which proposed to manage the Tata Trusts’ say in Tata Sons in order that the nominee administrators didn’t determine all the pieces for the group’s firms.

You have reached your restrict without spending a dime articles this month.

Subscription Benefits Include

Today’s Paper

Find mobile-friendly model of articles from the day’s newspaper in a single easy-to-read record.

Unlimited Access

Enjoy studying as many articles as you want with none limitations.

Personalised suggestions

A choose record of articles that match your pursuits and tastes.

Faster pages

Move easily between articles as our pages load immediately.


A one-stop-shop for seeing the newest updates, and managing your preferences.


We temporary you on the newest and most essential developments, thrice a day.

Support Quality Journalism.

*Our Digital Subscription plans don’t at the moment embody the e-paper, crossword and print.


Source link

Latest News

Michael Stuhlbarg Joins Hulu Limited Series Dopesick’

Los Angeles, Dec 15: “Your Honor” actor Michael Stuhlbarg has boarded the forged of Michael Keaton-led Hulu restricted...

More Articles Like This