The Delhi High Court on Thursday expressed concern over the persevering with protest exterior Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s residence right here, saying allowing such demonstrations in a residential space may set a incorrect precedent.
Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva mentioned at the moment the protest could also be peaceable, but when a precedent is about, then anybody would come and squat there as they do in areas, like Ramlila floor or Jantar Mantar right here, that are designated spots for holding protests.
“There is no problem if you come, protest and then go away. But this is going on for 11 days continuously. Once you set a precedent, anyone will come and squat there. If this is permitted for all time to come, then you know what is the state of certain areas, like Ramlila ground and Jantar Mantar, where squatting and protests are permitted. We cannot have that kind of a situation in a residential colony,” the court docket mentioned.
The issues had been expressed by the court docket whereas listening to a plea by the Civil Lines Residents Association towards the 11-day lengthy protest exterior the CM’s residence there on grounds that it was blocking a highway and inflicting inconvenience to residents there.
The affiliation has contended that protest has been permitted in a residential space and roads main there have been barricaded in violation of the excessive court docket’s 2017 path to limit dharnas in residential areas and to maintain the roads clear.
The mayors of the three municipal firms have been protesting exterior Mr Kejriwal’s residence looking for launch of funds and clearance of alleged pending dues payable to the MCDs.
The court docket, throughout the listening to, noticed that tents have come up within the space and there have been information experiences which acknowledged that the mayors had been going to run their workplaces from there.
The court docket requested the Delhi Police how workplaces may be run from there and likewise what preparations had been in place for the protestors to go about their every day routines like answering nature’s name.
It mentioned that whereas holding protests or dharnas was a basic proper, folks can’t be “squatting in a residential area”.
The court docket informed the federal government that issues mustn’t “go to such an extent where their (protestors) right to protest gets hampered”.
It requested the federal government whether or not some association may be made for the protestors.
Meanwhile, a resident of the realm who lives adjoining to the CM’s residence, informed the court docket there was no interference or disturbance by the protestors and that the highway in entrance of Mr Kejriwal’s residence was clear.